I'm convinced more professional is the paid tipster, more money will touch the subscriber and less money will touch the....paid tipster. It shouldn' be like this...
If a Tipster share 80 units of REAL profit in three months with -10, 120 and - 30 respectively and other Tipster share 20 units of UNREAL profit in three months sharing respectively 6,8 and 6, the first one will touch only one month of subcription and the second one all three months.
Ok, let's change first scenario and split those 80 units of REAL profit in 30,60 and -10. In this scenario, first one would touch two months of Subscription and the other one would touch the entire subscription.
By UNREAL profit, take in account early bets, trash bookies, live picks and mainly the big trap that happens daily: to pick w/o logic. How for God Sake, a tipster will place three stakes in a U20 game of 125 dollars and same or just one unit more in a 9k dollars match.
However, I would like to emphasize the fact a Professional Tipster Always have to try the big odds when he have a big spread in front of us. Otherwise he would be just a coward.
Variance month after month is natural.
The Blog w/o variance is a Blog without solid Real Profit.
Blogabet says it is not possible anymore to offer three to 12 months subscription as they used to do before.
So, @Brasil says is not possible anymore to (try to) offer the Heaven in Long Term.
I don' t care about myself and how many units a client have in his last day of contract. This aproach doesn' t suit to the Betting World.
My daily fight is against Pinnacle, Sbobet and Dafabet.
I like to beat them.
Sad but Blogabet doesn' t suit to what I believe is a Professional Service. That's why I will be obliged to back soon to the Betting World.
The day Blogabet make an effort to enlarge months of Subscription would be a better day.
But as i still see on Blogabet's main page "Top Paid" service or "High Yield" Service as something relevant, I don't have faith this scenario will change.
Even then, I love Blogabet. Cheers.
Comment is hidden because tipster is banned.
The answer is very simple. At least 95% of customers in Market are recreational bettors and for them 180 EUR limit is more than enough. Hence for them a service with 20% yield on joke bookmakers with small limits is much more profitable than 5% yield service with Pinnacle. For these customers is no difference if limit is 180 or 1800 EUR, because they bet 20-30 eur or so per bet anyway.
High-stake investors are not mugs. In the Market directory https://blogabet.com/market there are all the tools needed to filter which services have positive yield from high stakes bookmakers. It is not super user-friendly at the moment, but it is workable and high-stake investors are competent enough.
The main problem for high-stake investors at the moment is that small yield is rather risky. 5% in Pinnacle may look very good on paper, but for investors it is different story, because they are not the EXCLUSIVE customer. In most cases they have TO COMPETER with at least 1-2 other high-stakes investors who will be FASTEST to grab the original odds. This means they do not always get the advised odds and if they are 2-3% down on average, they are left with just 1-2% yield or even worse in the long term, which may not be worth the hassle. We are aware about this problem and we are working on possible solutions, it just takes time...
the smart investor will be wise enough, that would be when 5% of the profits at the Pinnacle you can always make money and sell the bid!
The smart investor knows that it's impossible to make 5% long term at Pinnacle.
I do not think blogabet stakes are so much about money as they are about certainty. How much you bet on an event should be based on how certain you are about the outcome and nothing else. If there happens to be a limit that is less that you would like to gamble, well f@ck. But that is an 1% problem. Personaly I only had this problem from books that have limited me.
Comment was deleted. Reason: I have changed my opinion