Here is a simple example. For example, There's a tipster with ROI +38%. Take a look at his record.

Total picks : 1000 Profit : +1050 Yield : +38%

Stakes : 1/10 picks : 800 Profit : +50 Yield : +6% (picks number 201~1000)

Stakes : 10/10 picks : 200 Profit : +1000 Yield : +50% (picks number 1~200)

The ROI we see is +38%. But is this tipster's ROI really +38%? this is just a trick.

 

This is the real ROI.

1. the most used stakes

2. stakes that have been used recently

Stakes : 1/10 picks : 800 Profit : +50 Yield : +6% (picks number 201~1000)

For the example above, the real ROI is +6%. (strict standard)

 

I saw you offer Yield LS on another Tipster site. This is a very good way. 

* Yield LS : Simulated yield with fixed stakes 

The record when you used yield LS by relaxing the criteria.

Stakes : 1/10 picks : 1000 Profit : +150 Yield : +15%

 

+38% > +15% > +6%

What do you think is a real ROI?

But, unfortunately Blogabet does not provide yield LS.

Therefore, it is necessary to carefully examine the detailed records directly to find a competent tipster here. 

I think stakes are especially important because Blogabet has loopholes that don’t provide yield LS.